• • Whip and the Body, The
  • Hunt for Eagle One, The
  • Resident Evil: Extinction
  • The Firm
  • Silver City
  • Lost City, The
  • Sands of Iwo Jima
  • There Will Be Blood
  • Good Year, A
  • 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer

• • Uncategorized

• • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009

• • Alive or Dead
  • badgirlsfromvalleyhigh
  • Domino
  • http://badboysii.neopetscity.com/
  • Kickin It Old Skool
  • showdowninlittletokyo

• • Log in
  • XHTML

Whip and the Body, The (1963) IMDB rating: 7.00 Plot: Kurt Menliff (Christopher Lee) is a ruthless and sadistic 19th Century nobleman who returns to his seafront castle home after years of wondering and is immediately at odds with his invalid father, a Count, as well as Kurt’s spinless younger brother Christian, whom is married to Kurt’s cousin and former lover Nevenka. When Kurt is found in his room on the next night, murdered, suspicion falls on everyone which gets more complicated when Nevenka begins seeing his ghost (real or imaginary?) haunting the castle supposedly wanting revenge against his killers.

buy cheap online and download Whip and the Body, The

Actors: Lee Christopher,Kendall Tony,De Nardo Gustavo,Pigozzi Luciano,Herlin Jacques,Horror,

What was your favorite Royal Rumble and why? + YWSE Royal Rumble Results!?
Match 1
Knockout

Hunt for Eagle One, The (2006) IMDB rating: 3.60 Plot: A group of US Marines are sent to rescue captured a US Marine and a Filipino Captain while stopping a group of Al-Qaeda-backed local rebels from launching biological weapons.

find Hunt for Eagle One, The here and download version for PDA

Actors: Dacascos Mark,Hauer Rutger,Suba Joe,McGowan Zach,Fozzy Joe,Malonzo Rey,Cepeda Ricardo,Avellana Joe Mari,Asinas Ronald,Escutin Robert,Corpuz Jerry,de Guzman Troy,Bulado Reiven,Giray Joel,Action,

Who's the NFL Comeback Player of the Year 2009?
The player named Comeback Player of the Year shows perseverance in overcoming adversity, in the form of not being in the NFL the previous year, a severe injury, or simply poor performance.

There’s an odd number of potential candidates this year, most of them for an odd variety of reasons. The main candidates I can think of are:

Vince Young, QB, Tennessee Titans: Many thought his career as a starter was done after his week 1 injury in 2008, and the psychological breakdown that followed. He’d be cemented as a bust, after a promising start, including winning Rookie of the Year. After getting the starting job after an 0-6 start, his team has gone 7-2, with him having his first 300 yard game and a 3 TD game and 6 games with a 90+ QB rating. He was helped plenty by the emergence of Chris Johnson, but that does not entirely diminish the comeback season he’s having.

Tom Brady, QB, New England Patriots: Many thought this reward was reserved for him as soon as he got injured in week 1 of last season, but he has had an oddly quiet year for a former MVP. However, he still has somewhat impressive numbers this year, over 90 QB rating over the year (unlike Young who only did it in some games), throwing "only" 29 touchdown passes, and leading his team to a AFC East title. It’s no 50 touchdown season, but most teams would be happy with that.

Brett Favre, QB, Minnasota Vikings: Man, this guy is easy to hate. The last thing you want is him to get another award over more deserving canidates, right? Well… he did have that torn bicep that limited him down the stretch, which also built up the mentality of the the unfortunate team who picks him up next year is going to have him collapse in December. And while the Vikings as a team have not gone undefeated in December, it’s far from Favre’s fault alone, as he’s yet to put up terrible numbers on the year, his "worst" game being the two touchdown two interception game against Arizona. With an over 100 QB rating on the year, and a 3+ to 1 TD:INT ratio, Brett’s been having one of his best years this year. Granted, with the help of an awesome defense and running back, but nobody’s taking away Peyton’s MVP for having an awesome offensive line.

Shawne Merriman, OLB, San Diego Chargers: A popular preseason pick, he has not produced much on the actual field. More of a formality saying his name, he’s been sidelined this year by foot and groin injuries, and does not have impressive stats. Not to say he’s just a dead body out there, his name and history seems to demand respect from the opposing offense, giving him double teams, which allows his teammates to get better pressure as well, such as Shaun Phillip’s league leading 7 forced fumbles. But a long shot as best for this award.

Of course, nobody would be a bigger long shot then..

Michael Vick, QB, Philadelphia Eagles: Nobody in the league has gone through more adversity to return to the NFL. Granted, this adversity was pretty much all self caused, and the kind that many people will never forgive him for. Not to mention even before going to jail, he had a lot of critics, saying he could never really pass the ball well, he was all gimmick, no QB. Putting aside how you personally feel about is crimes, he’s come back from two years out of the league, is learning a new system and a new role, and has gotten better over the season to become a legit weapon. We’ve heard of goal line running backs, but a goal line quarterback? However, he only has a few snaps a game, and has taken a while to really come on in this role. He’s mainly on this list for the massive adversity then his improved performance. Not to mention, the reaction to him getting the Ed Hunt courage award showed that most people do not feel he’s earned the right to collect any accolades yet. This one’s going to make people rant and rave. Isn’t arguing fun?

Who do you think is most deserving of the Comeback Player of the Year award? Someone on this list, or someone unmentioned?
Gaaah, forgot about Benson. He’d qualify for sure, Drew Brees (At the time of the Chargers) got it in 2004, when before hand he just wasn’t very good.

---

While I agree with your opinions on Vince Young, if it were up to me I’d give it to Cedric Benson.

dorito_420 | Dec 31, 2009

---

No love for Cedric Benson?
thegunn | Dec 31, 2009

---

to come back you need to have been somewhere to begin with, hence no love for cedric benson.
jefferson | Dec 31, 2009

---

Don’t know about Favre qualifying, wasn’t he in the probowl a year ago? Vick’s pretty much been a non-factor, therefore ineligible.

Either Brady or Benson, imo.
??? ?v?? | Dec 31, 2009

---

Brett Favre but Cedric Benson was yet to be mentioned.
AGM | Dec 31, 2009

---

defintenly vince young
wazz up | Dec 31, 2009

Resident Evil: Extinction (2007) IMDB rating: 6.30 Plot: Years after the Raccoon City disaster, Alice (MILLA JOVOVICH) is on her own knowing that she has become a liability and could endanger those around her is struggling to survive and bring down the Umbrella Corporation lead by the sinister Albert Wesker (JASON O’MARA) and head researcher Dr. Issacs (IAN GLEN). Meanwhile traveling through the Nevada Desert and through the ruins of Las Vegas Carlos Olivera, (ODED FEHR) L.J., (MIKE EPPS) and new survivors K-Mart, (SPENCER LOCKE) Claire Redfield,(ALI LARTER) and Nurse Betty (ASHANTI) must fight to survive extinction against hoards of zombies, killer crows and the most terrifying creatures created as a result of the deadly T-Virus that has killed millions.

Actors: Fehr Oded,Glen Iain,Epps Mike,Hudson Gary,Abadie William,Ashby Linden,Bentley John Eric,Cramer Rick,Durand Chris,Egan Christopher,Franco Ramon,Action,Horror,Sci-Fi,Thriller,

resident evil 4 and 5?
are they going to make a resident evil 4 or 5 in human form NOT animation beacuse animation is stupid and im a huge fan does any one know if they will amke it cuz on extinction it ended weird and seems like that there needs to be more explanation

---

No.

sneakysnake128 | Oct 19, 2009

---

In September 2010, Resident Evil: Afterlife is scheduled to come out. It follows Resident Evil: Extinction
Chris | Oct 18, 2009

---

5 baby!! All the way it is the best and the graphics are awesome. It scared me so I watch my husband play first lol
brownsurga06 | Oct 18, 2009

---

Yes. First is Resident Evil Afterlife which comes out in 2010. Afterlife will be the first in a new triology of RE movies that continues after Extinction. So there will be a 4, 5, and 6, all live action, no animation.
Justin | Oct 22, 2009

The Firm (2009) IMDB rating: 5.40 Plot: Set in the 1980s, Dom is a teenager who finds himself drawn into the charismatic world of football ‘casuals,influenced by the firm’s top boy, Bex. Accepted by the gang for his fast mouth and sense of humor, Dom soon becomes one the boys. But as Bex and his gang clash with rival firms across the country and the violence spirals out of control, Dom realizes he wants out - until he learns it’s not that easy to simply walk away.

Actors: Anderson Paul,Allen Doug,Campbell Richie,Edwards Elliott Joseph,Jackson Joe,Mays Daniel,McNab Calum,Scantori Frank,Seymour Billy,Shockley Ben,Webber Eddie,Drama,

When should a firm shut down?
If Total Revenue is 100
Variable costs are 80
non variable short run costs are 60
and total cost is 140

Should a firm shut down at 40, 60, or 90 Why or why not?

Silver City (2004) IMDB rating: 6.10 Plot: Set against the backdrop of a mythic “New West,” a satire that follows grammatically-challenged, “user-friendly” candidate Dicky Pilager, scapegrace scion of Colorado’s venerable Senator Jud Pilager, during his gubernatorial campaign. When Pilager finds that he’s reeled in a corpse during the taping of an environmental political ad, his ferocious campaign manager, Chuck Raven, hires former idealistic journalist turned rumpled private detective Danny O’Brien to investigate potential links between the corpse and the Pilager family’s enemies. Danny’s investigation pulls him deeper and deeper into a complex web of influence and corruption, involving high stakes lobbyists, media conglomerates, environmental plunderers, and undocumented migrant workers.

Actors: Cooper Chris,Dreyfuss Richard,Lindsey Cajardo,Ashton John C.,Martinez Donevon,Gammon James,Kroger Benjamin,Mitchell Charles,Huston Danny,Clennon David,Roth Tim,Comedy,Drama,Mystery,Thriller,

Help with metal allergy's & piercings please?
I am allergic to a metal called Nickel and a few other ones found in cheap jewelry & belts (Usually found in Wal-Mart). I want to get a lip piercing or a nose piercing but my mom won’t let me because she firmly believes that I’d just break out in a rash like I usually do when I wear my studded belt or cheap necklace, even if I could get a pure silver or gold piercing since I do not break out with these types of metal. So. I was wondering if all tattoo/piercing parlors ONLY carry hypo-allergenic jewelry for piercings (My friend who is getting hip piercings told me this.). But if they don’t, where can I find hypo-allergenic jewelry shop (or a tattoo parlor) located in the Tri-Cities Washington area or a web site to order it from if I must. I really want to get a piercing but lucky me I’m allergic to most things metal, please help me out!

---

Call the parlor and ask what they carry. Not sure about the Tri-Cities which is near where I grew up and I recall as being pretty remote, but a lot of places carry filament piercing jewelry and stuff that’s plastic, niobium or other non-reactive materials. You’re probably better off with the nose piercing than the lip in terms of infection and bad reaction. The nose is cartilage that doesn’t tend to bleed or anything. the lip is thicker, has an active blood supply and is in constant contact with germy saliva. But, a good piercer will go over all your options with you.

Cali | Feb 01, 2010

---

Well, I’m allergic to practically all metal earrings so I use gold earrings or I paint fingernail polish on the part that goes into your ear so that I won’t break out. If you get a piercing with gold rings, you won’t break out.
dancer4ever! | Feb 01, 2010

---

All tattoo shops do care some sort of nickel free jewelry for their customers with sensitive skin. Mention this beforehand and they will pierce you with a higher quality (as in, nickle-free) metal (although, it may cost a little bit more).
??ced | Feb 01, 2010

Lost City, The (2005) IMDB rating: 6.90 Plot: In Havana, Cuba in the late 1950’s, a wealthy family, one of whose sons is a prominent nightclub owner, is caught in the violent transition from the oppressive regime of Batista to the Marxist government of Fidel Castro. Castro’s regime ultimately leads the nightclub owner to flee to New York.

Actors: Garcia Andy,Milian Tomas,Bradford Richard,Carbonell Nestor,Murciano Enrique,Hoffman Dustin,Murray Bill,Bauer Steven,Fernandez Juan,Garcia Jsu,Marquez William,Mechoso Julio Oscar,Drama,

Should Man City sack Mancini after ANOTHER defeat…?
He’s lost more games at City this season than Hughes did…

---

No, they will let him manage for the rest of the season. Mancini is the high profile manager that the Sheik wanted. It will be another year before his team really gels.
Drew L | Feb 06, 2010

---

why?
Best # 10 | Feb 06, 2010

---

Frankly, I never did understand why Mancini was brought in to replace Hughes. If Hughes was going to be sacked, why bring in a someone of the same calibre. There was nothing to suggest Mancini would have been a better manager.
He won his first title with Inter on default. The second when Juventus was already relegated and Milan starting with a 15 point deficit. The third when Milan and Juventus were still rebuilding. Even then, Inter still sacked him. So, how was Mancini a better choice then Hughes?
The Man City bosses really screwed it up. They can’t afford to sack him now. Well, then can.. right. I say, bring Hughes back.
jyoti | Feb 06, 2010

---

Yeah but he’s won the same amount of games with Hughes squad.

Jesus ONE more defeat than stagnant Hughes?

If this was 1989 you’d DEFINITELY be a "no more excuses, bye bye Fergie" placard holder.
Fox: One Percenter | Feb 06, 2010

---

i posted that question earlier

yes they should - lol he needs more time to bring to players together
I Live In Paradise | Feb 06, 2010

---

man.. you united fans are really passionate about your ex-players.

Mancini is twice the manager mark hughes is. Even if he does finish 5th just remember that he couldn’t do much worse than hughes.
Michael (AFL) | Feb 06, 2010

Sands of Iwo Jima (1949) IMDB rating: 7.10 Plot: John Marion Stryker is the ultimate Marine, a tough rifle squad leader who in 1943 is assigned a squad of new recruits saddled with three veterans and an old enemy of Stryker’s from previous duties in the Far East. One recruit in particlar is a source of friction with Stryker, Peter Conway, whose father was Stryker’s CO at Guadalcanal and who felt his son was too soft and cowardly to be a Marine. The squad grows more and more resentful at Stryker’s increasingly brutal training regimen and his lack of sympathy for the varied personal problems of the recruits, but his determination to mold them into fighting men helps save their lives when the squad is landed at Tarawa in November 1943 and Stryker risks his life to blow up a Japanese bunker that has slaughtered Marines trapped at a log wall. The now battle-tested squad becomes more closely-knit and Stryker’s relationship with the men warms as the squad eventually finds itself in the bloodiest island battle of the war, at Iwo Jima.

Actors: Wayne John,Agar John,Tucker Forrest,Cassell Wally,Brown James,Webb Richard,Franz Arthur,Holden James,Coe Peter,Jaeckel Richard,Murphy William,Tyne George,Baylor Hal,McGuire John,Milner Martin,Action,Drama,War,Romance,

Why do marines remove the helmet chinstrap?
In the 1949 classic, ‘the Sands of Iwo Jima’ as marines descend from the ship onto the landing craft sergeant Styker, played by John Wayne instructs one of his marines to unbuckle his chinstrap. The next frame shows scores of marines all with their helmets unstrapped.

Why did Stryker gesture to his marine to unfasten the chinstrap on his helmet?
Could it be that a fastened helmet could be an impediment if the marine were to fall in the water, as the helmet could fill with water?

thanks

---

During World War II and later, many soldiers wore the webbing chinstraps unfastened or looped around the back of the helmet and clipped together. This practice arose for two reasons: First, because hand-to-hand combat was anticipated, and an enemy could be expected to attack from behind, reach over the helmet, grab its visor, and pull. If the chinstrap were worn, the head would be snapped back, causing the victim to lose balance, and leave the throat and stomach exposed to a knife thrust. Secondly, many men incorrectly believed that a nearby exploding bomb or artillery shell could cause the chinstrap to snap their neck when the helmet was caught in its concussive force, although a replacement buckle, the T-1 pressure-release buckle, was manufactured which allowed the chinstrap to become automatically unclipped should this occur. In place of the chinstrap, the nape strap inside the liner was counted on to provide sufficient contact to keep the helmet from easily falling off the wearer’s head

Copied from Wiki.

Technically we were supposed to wear them.

SSG US Army 73-82

Wayne C | Mar 09, 2008

---

because if you got hit on the helmet with the chinstrap on, it could break your neck, if the chinstrap is off, it would just knock the helmet off
There is no spoon | Mar 09, 2008

---

it looks cooler unbuckled that’s the only reason.
darrell m | Mar 09, 2008

---

besides it was a movie not reality, it was the movie that started the misnomer Lock and load! THEY were using m-1 rifles, you cannot load the magazine with the bolt locked!
mlbjock_58 | Mar 09, 2008

---

First off it was in the script. Second it would take a larger caliber round than small arms fire to actually snap a neck. Third, it is unauthorized to wear the K-Pod or ballistics helmet with out the chinstrap off. With that being said, with all the movement from one cover to another you risk the possibility of the helmet to fall off and then you are guaranteed to take a kill shot to the head.
acot_anthonym | Mar 09, 2008

---

if their is an expolsion near by and your chin strap is fastened it could blow off and break your neck so to keep your head on and not break your neck from the bomb or expolsic=ve devise undo always the chin stap….that is the answer.sempir fi
caos | Mar 09, 2008

There Will Be Blood (2007) IMDB rating: 8.40 Plot: Set in the early 20th century, the film follows the rise to power of Daniel Plainview — a charismatic and ruthless oil prospector, driven to succeed by his intense hatred of others and psychological need to see any and all competitors fail. When he learns of oil-rich land in California that can be bought cheaply, he moves his operation there and begins manipulating and exploiting the local landowners into selling him their property. Using his young adopted son H.W. to project the image of a caring family man, Plainview gains the cooperation of almost all the locals with lofty promises to build schools and cultivate the land to make their community flourish. Over time, Plainview’s gradual accumulation of wealth and power causes his true self to surface, and he begins to slowly alienate himself from everyone in his life.

Actors: Day-Lewis Daniel,Dano Paul,O’Connor Kevin J.,Hinds Ciaran,Freasier Dillon,Harvard Russell,Carver Randall,Breznahan Kevin,Carr Brad,Flanagan Mark,Froio Vince,Howes Hans,Kerry John,Meskimen Jim,Tompkins Paul F.,Drama,

If God is all powerful, why did he have to send his son?
Do Christians believe that he was not powerful enough to forgive the world’s sins without the blood of Christ? By definition God has all power & therefore he could forgive us for sins without having to sacrifice his only son… to himself. This also raises the question: What happened to people who died before Christ? Were they in a state of limbo? If so, I would much prefer it that way then having the population of the earth divided into either heaven or hell. Even the most brutal of dictators wouldn’t condemn their worst enemies to this place of eternal damnation.

---

It is only stupid story by the top story tellers in the universe , man
Tom | Feb 05, 2010

---

He didn’t have to have a son. He just chose to have a son.

Also how do you know what the most brutal dictators would and wouldn’t do?
Exodiafinder | Feb 05, 2010

---

I don’t believe there is a "god", therefore no son of "god".
IanCorrigible | Feb 05, 2010

---

It is an idiotic idea and rejected by anyone who actually thinks about it.

We would institutionalize anyone who killed their child or allowed them to be killed, just so they could forgive their neighbor down the street.

Jesus dying on the cross for the sins of mankind makes no more sense than tossing virgins into volcanoes to bring the rains and a bountiful harvest.
Ed | Feb 05, 2010

---

Sending his son to die was just an excuse for forgetting to use protection with Mary.
Don't be a Pecker | Feb 05, 2010

---

Yeah, it would have saved a lot of time and he might have even done a better job. I guess he just wanted to see the kid suffer.
Rod | Feb 05, 2010

---

God is all powerful, without a doubt. It is not for us to question the method He chose to save us. The shedding of blood was His chosen means of sacrifice - throughout history. The shedding of Christ’s blood covers our iniquities and makes us clean before Him. In His mercy and goodness, he sent His own Son to be a sacrifice for our sins. He loves you greatly and desires communion with you. Peace.
Emily H | Feb 05, 2010

---

You dictate to GOD how to Be GOD? Psalm 8 (Amplified Bible)
4What is man that You are mindful of him, and the son of [earthborn] man that You care for him?
Hebrews 2 (Amplified Bible) 6It has been solemnly and earnestly said in a certain place, What is man that You are mindful of him, or the son of man that You graciously and helpfully care for and visit and look after him?
AutumnWynd777 | Feb 05, 2010

---

Those before Jesus, needed to believe in the promise of the coming of the Messiah, to be saved. JESUS is the Messiah!

The Old Testament showed that blood must be shed for sins. But not just any blood. Those Old Testament sacrifices didn’t pay for ANY sins. Those were temporary sacrifices, pointing to the REAL sacrifice, which is JESUS.

Hebrews 9:22 "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission."

We are all sinners. Only JESUS is acceptable PAYMENT for our sins. All the good deeds in the world won’t pay for even ONE of our sins. All the "living a moral life" won’t pay for even one of our sins.

Jesus died on the cross to pay for our sins, and then Jesus rose from the dead. That is why Jesus had to die on the cross, because there is no other way for us to be saved. You must believe in Jesus alone for salvation, to be saved. That simple.

Either Jesus already paid for a person’s sins, or that person will pay for their sins in eternal torment in hell. That is the choice before everyone.

The truth about Jesus is that the only way to be saved and to get into heaven and avoid being sent to eternal hell, is by believing in Jesus for salvation, believing in faith alone that Jesus, who is God, died on the cross for all our sins as FULL PAYMENT for all our sins, and then Jesus rose from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). Believe in Jesus alone for salvation, and you will be in heaven, no matter what!

Jesus is God, and Jesus loves you so very much! And the Trinity is true!

Salvation is a FREE GIFT that happens in a split second when you believe in Jesus to save you! It is impossible to lose or "leave" salvation (John 6:39-40, John 10:28, 1 John 5:13).

Please pray now: "Jesus, I believe that You died on the cross to pay for my sins and that You rose from the dead, and I thank You for eternal life!" You will be in heaven with Him forever when you die!

The ONLY way to get into heaven, is by believing in Jesus alone for salvation (John 14:6, Acts 4:12, John 3:16)
David | Feb 05, 2010

---

They were saved by faith in God, jehovah and his promise of a Messiah who will have paid for all their sins before the judgement of ALL EVIL.

The only currency that could pay for all the sins of men was God’s very blood!

Think of it as God the Judge in court who loved the guilty and cannot violate his own laws, yet needs to condemns the devil and his evil.

The lion and the lamb is jesus - justice and mercy
SPL Texas | Feb 05, 2010

---

I like you , I didn’t even think of that .
What | Feb 05, 2010

---

Sin needed a perfect atonement. God can not let a sinner into heaven, so the sins must be atoned for. It all comes back to the Just nature of God. "Even the most brutal dictators" are not God, and do not have a divine moral standard. Why would sinners deserve eternal paradise?
Chocolateface | Feb 05, 2010

---

Because God is perfect, his justice is also perfect. God requires soul for soul. Adam lost a perfect soul plunging man into sin and imperfection so that every descendant of Adam was imperfect and had sinned. Only Jesus Christ, the Son of God who was perfect, could give his life as a ransom to buy back Adam’s lost perfect life bringing forgiveness. All who have died and will die that are in God’s memory, are waiting for the resurrection.
light of truth | Feb 05, 2010

---

Cause back in the day in order to be forgiven of your sins you needed a sacrafice. And since adam and eve’s big sin it required a big sacrafice.
_$ Bulldog $_ | Feb 05, 2010

---

I agree with everything that you’ve posted here. It is inconceivable to me that an omnipotent, omniscient Being operates through blood sacrifice. It’s a horrendous idea and does not make me think all that highly of this character people call "God."
Weston | Feb 05, 2010

---

Doesn’t the word of "God" kill you or something
Sessha | Feb 05, 2010

---

the more i have understood the theology of the Godhead vs the Trinity doctrines. the more i realize that God shares His Almighty Power.
that the Plurality of the sons of God define the Godhead to be universal, but to us there is One God and one Lord and the Holy Ghost.

to conclude that God is NOT all powerful is an error of interpretation.
to say that God the Father HORDES all power unto himself is also an error in conclusion.

to Say that Jesus Had to learn to create and then had to learn by the things he suffered shows that He himself is powerful and can be called all mighty but is not the FAther at the same time.
Jesus was not given the throne over the earth till he overcam all things as rev 3:21 and 21:7 seem to imply. i think its conclusive that Jesus is a different, individual Personage in the Godhead that was ordained to be a god which The FAther shares with all His sons of God by "merit".
witnessofJesus | Feb 05, 2010

---

If you think it is all such nonsense then why do you spend so much time thinking about it?

Study it for yourself, you might actually learn something because right now, you clearly don’t have a clue about what the Bible says.
Linner | Feb 05, 2010

---

I agree with david on this subject. Please chose him for the best answer. I am truly 100 per cent with david on this one.
becomeblackbelt | Feb 05, 2010

Good Year, A (2006) IMDB rating: 6.70 Plot: After years of no contact with his Uncle Henry, London banker and bond trader Max Skinner learns that Henry has died intestate, so Max inherits a chateau and vineyard in Provence. Max spent part of his childhood there, learning maxims and how to win and lose, and honing his killer instinct (at chess, which serves him well in finance). Max goes to France intent on selling the property. He spends a few days there, getting the property ready to show. Memories, a beautiful woman, and a young American who says she’s Henry’s illegitimate daughter interrupt his plans. Did Max the boy know things that Max the man has forgotten?

Download Good Year, A

Actors: Highmore Freddie,Finney Albert,Crowe Russell,Spall Rafe,Coyle Richard,Righton Ben,Kennedy Patrick,Daniel Mays,Hudson Stephen,Hollander Tom,Briand Lionel,Comedy,Drama,Romance,

How to change my relationship with my mother?
Okay, I’ll start with this:

5 years ago my father left the family to be with another woman, so I can understand why my mom hates my dad. And for some time I did too. I felt hurt and bothered and my mom and I became very close and even friends because we had the same views, but now that I’m older, I’m starting to see why my dad left. My mom is a good person, I know she is, but she is very very VERY controlling. When I was younger I used to do exactly what she said because I was you know, a kid and never thought that things could be different. But then, I began to notice things were starting to change around the age of 14. She began to really push her views on me and make me do multiple chores at once.

Example: I would be doing the laundry and then she would make me wash the dishes while still doing the laundry. And before I can get to the dishes she begins to freak out on why I haven’t done them yet.

And I, again, never really thought about it until I was 16. I began to see my father more often, and I’ve always had a great bond with him ever since I was little. And now that it had been years since the divorce, I started connecting with him again and found out that his girl friend is a really nice person. So I’d like to say that our relationship is healed and out of all my siblings, my personality is almost exactly like my fathers. So after staying the summer with him, things really began to shift in my house. My mom started to compare everything to the divorce. If I didn’t get to the chores fast enough she would say "Well your father left me so I have do all this work by myself!" And "Your father isn’t here to help me!" And I would think to my self that the divorce has nothing to do with the fact that I forgot to do the dishes.

She also began to ask questions when ever my dad called me. My conversations with my dad usually revolve around me, school, friends, and nothing about my mom. My dad and my mom don’t get along and I can understand that my dad really doesn’t want my mom in his life, so we don’t talk about her, but she thinks we do. She believes that when ever we talk we are talking behind her back! And we are not!

And now, just this year, she has began to take her controlling to a whole other level. She has now admitted to my face that my older brother is her favorite child, and even when he is home (since he moved back temporarily) she makes me do ALL the chores while my brother sits on his butt watching tv! Its not fair, so I tried to tell her and she begins to go off on me and again, bring my father into the picture.

Then she began to get on my case for not doing anything after school (i.e. sports, clubs, etc) so I decided to join basketball cheer leading with my friend. But once that started she began to get all hissy with me when every time I got home from practice and why I didn’t do my chores.Cheer leading takes up a lot of my time! Practice starts at 3:30 to 5:30 every other day and in Between those are games that last anywhere from 4:30 and last to 9:00pm! In between those times I have to squeeze in homework and studying and others!

She also complains about me not making dinner, so one day I decided to be nice and make a whole dinner with out her asking me to and do all the dishes before and after wards! Not only did she not thank me at ALL, but she refused to eat my noodles and freaked out when I forgot to wash one cup! ONE!

For over a year now I have thought about living with my dad. And now, its gotten to the point that the only reason I’m staying with my mom is because I currently have very good friends, and not because pf my mom. I can say with out hesitation that I have a growing animosity towards my mom, and I hate that because she is my mom and I would like to change our relationship to make things better! Please help!

4: Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007) IMDB rating: 6.00 Plot: With Von Doom back in his homeland of Latveria the fantastic four have new troubles when Galactus has decided that Earth is his next target. When his henchman, The Silver Surfer, is sent to Earth he discovers that he’s getting more than he bargained for when he encounters the Fantastic Four. But that’s not all when Dr. Doom decides that after two years in the homeland he is ready to return.

Actors: Gruffudd Ioan,Evans Chris,Chiklis Michael,Jones Doug,McMahon Julian,Benson Peter,Braugher Andre,Duffy Graeme,Fishburne Laurence,Grover Fabrice,Menendez Gonzalo,Action,Adventure,Fantasy,Sci-Fi,

How much for these video games?
8 games Wii and GameCube:
Chronicles of Narnia: GameCube
NBA Live 2005: GameCube
Lego Star Wars ( episodes 1-3): GameCube
Pokemon Colosseum: GameCube
NFL Blitz 2003: GameCube
Metroid Prime:GameCube
NBA Live 08 : Wii
Fantastic 4 Rise of the Silver Surfer: Wii

I’m selling at my local video game store.
Please say how much for each or for all
i don’t really want to sell online either

---

for the wii games you might get a good $10 to $15 dollars for them, but that’s pushing it a bit. as for the gamecube games you’ll be lucky enough to get a good $5
Quita E | Aug 01, 2009

---

not that much for the older games..easiest and best way to sell any video games is on ebay
nick | Aug 01, 2009

• WP Themes

  • Activate
  • Blindigo
  • Blue Zinfandel
  • Eye Candy
  • Detour
  • Frequency
  • Gladiola
  • Radiance
  • Vertigo
  • Vertigo Squared
  • Wonderland